Tuesday, June 16, 2015

DID MODI HELP ANOTHER MODI?

#LalitModi  #SushmaSwaraj #IplChief #BlueCornerNotice

DID SUSHMA SWARAJ HELP CRIMINAL LALIT MODI WITH TACIT SUPPORT OF PM?


THE FIRST YEAR'S CELEBRATION CUT SHORT BY GRIEVOUS ACCUSATION...


Contrary to BJP's expectation, the bomb exploded right over the celebration of Modi's government that had ensued with two heavy-weight slogans, VARSH EK KAM ANEK & MODI SARKAR KAAM LAGATAAR. For a past few days, the Congress is relentlessly assailing Modi Govt. from every possible angle & position over how Sushma Swaraj helped Lalit Modi, the former IPL Chief, a high profile absconder of law embellished with Blue corner notice against him, who has serious allegations of money laundering to the tune of hundreds of crores pertaining to IPL that was launched by him. On the other hand, the PM is suffering from fresh serious allegation of defending the foreign minister, Sushma Swaraj because of the undue favour to Lalit Modi by her under PM's tacit support it seems, said Rahul Gandhi. It looks obvious that Sushma had extended her helping hand due to latent nod of PM, added Rahul in Chhatisgarh. 


Though, she is fighting back fiercely with tweet after tweets that she extended favor merely on humanitarian grounds since Lalit Modi's wife was suffering from cancer and her hubby needed travel documents badly for her treatment but no body seems prepared to believe her words any longer since her daughter Bansuri Swaraj also is believed to be working in the battery of high profile lawyers for Lalit Modi who is believed to have helped her husband's nephew as well for admission in England. The Pandora of evils is not yet fully open and it is going to put many more to shame. The opposition is demanding and looks hell-bent on her resignation.

It appears the serious charges slapped on foreign Minister is bound to take sacrifice of her ministry in the times to come. Ashutosh from AAP has remarked appositely on this controversial issue that if Sushma Swaraj is asked to help some terrorist on humanitarian grounds, would she still help?

No comments: